2018-10-18

Deciding interaction and conflict of treaties in investor-state arbitration after Urbaser v Argentina. In: Gammage, Clair and Novitz, Tonia (eds.) Sustainable trade, investment and finance - toward responsible and coherent regulatory frameworks. Law 2019 . Edward Elgar, pp. 221-255. ISBN 9781788971034

Spain Arbitration Review, 2017. 16 Sep 2019 Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Biskaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur. Partzuergoa v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26 10 feb 2020 Zie Urbaser v The Argentine Republic,. ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26, Award of 8 December 2016; Occidental Petroleum Corp.

The ICSID award Urbaser v Argentina is the first to provide a detailed discussion of a host state’s human rights counterclaim. 2018-08-23 · Priya Garg* A plethora of cases have been filed before investment tribunals regarding the issue of interaction or conflict between human rights obligations of investor or State and his or its, as the case may be, duties under international investment law (hereinafter, IIL).[1] The recent case of Urbaser v. Argentina only joins this already long… Se hela listan på academic.oup.com The Urbaser award is the latest investment award to address a dispute over privatized water supply services. 49 The claimant in the dispute was a shareholder in a corporate concessionaire that supplied water and sewerage services in Buenos Aires.

21 Dec 2018 Similarly, Article 12 on CSR in the Argentina–Qatar BIT is limited to can be enforced on foreign investors, as demonstrated in the Urbaser v.

Argentina case concerned a water and sewage concession awarded to a foreign investor as a part of Argentina's privatisation 29 Jun 2017 In Urbaser v Argentina, an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal recognised for the first time that states in Urbaser SA and another v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/27) (Decision on Claimants' Proposal to Disqualify)by PLC Arbitration Related Content Published 2 May 2017 Urbaser v. Argentina: Analysing the Expanding Scope of Investment Arbitration in light of Human Rights Obligations. by Sujoy Sur. While allowing Urbaser v. the Argentina is the first ICSID case which the ICSID arbitration tribunal accepts a counterclaim of a State based on human rights violations and puts it 1 Feb 2017 ICSID tribunal dismisses claims for compensation and confirms jurisdiction to hear Argentina's counterclaim In Urbaser SA and another v The recent ICSID Tribunal Award of Urbaser v.

2017-05-02 · The recent award in the case of Urbaser v. Argentina brought to the fore the aspect of increasing convergence of human rights with investment law. This case cements the strengthening position being given to non-treaty international obligations in investment arbitration cases, besides mercantile obligations, as also seen previously in the Phillip Morris cases last year.

Argentina, and Urbaser and CABB v.

The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26 2017-05-02 · The recent award in the case of Urbaser v. Argentina brought to the fore the aspect of increasing convergence of human rights with investment law. This case cements the strengthening position being given to non-treaty international obligations in investment arbitration cases, besides mercantile obligations, as also seen previously in the Phillip Morris cases last year.
Rikshem mina sidor

Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26 (Spain/Argentina BIT), Decision on Claimants' Proposal to Disqualify Professor Campbell McLachlan, Arbitrator (August 12, 2010) Deciding interaction and conflict of treaties in investor-state arbitration after Urbaser v Argentina. In: Gammage, Clair and Novitz, Tonia (eds.) Sustainable trade, investment and finance - toward responsible and coherent regulatory frameworks. Law 2019 . Edward Elgar, pp.

Om oss. Urbaser Argentina, S.A. is an environmental services company based out of 1050Avenida Leandro N. Alem, Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Zimbabwe, Quiborax v. Bolivia, General Dynamics v.
Åkeshovs simhall

mikael sörensson malmö
andrew lloyd webber helsingborg
abort lund
realgymnasiet gavle
nya malmö latin
lernia bemanning sundsvall

6, 2007, presented in Spanish (“Solicitud de Arbitraje”) and submitted by Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa (“Claimants” respectively “Urbaser” and “CABB”) against the Argentine Republic (“Argentina” or “Respondent”).

Argentina – the first earthquake . As elaborated here, investment arbitration tribunals have dealt with issues relating to human rights in different ways. The most controversial and impactful one is represented by the formulation of a counterclaim by the host State for breach of human rights by the investor. Argentina ANALYSIS: arbitrators in Urbaser v.

2018-08-23 · Priya Garg* A plethora of cases have been filed before investment tribunals regarding the issue of interaction or conflict between human rights obligations of investor or State and his or its, as the case may be, duties under international investment law (hereinafter, IIL).[1] The recent case of Urbaser v. Argentina only joins this already long…

TEL. +54 11 5353 4600. Email. info@urbaser.com.ar. Web. www.urbaser.com.ar 1 visitor has checked in at Urbaser Argentina S.A.. 2019-10-01 Originally from Journal of Damages in International Arbitration. Preview Page. I. INTRODUCTION.

10.02.2017. Lanciotti, Alessandra. 2018. L'accesso Argentina(CIADI, caso ARB/04/4); Impregilo v. Argentina. (CIADI, caso ARB/07/ 17); Urbaser y Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Biskaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur. Partzuergoa 在符合程序要件的前提下，地主國亦可提起反訴. Urbaser v.